By Gregg Kell, Founder and Editor
Every Provider Claims Full Service. Almost None of Them Define It.
Search the phrase and the results look identical. Platforms claim it. Brokers claim it. Professional employer organizations claim it. The words appear on nearly every payroll website in the market, and they carry almost no information.
Karen Halladay, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, CCP, CTM, is Founder and CEO of H2R-Solutions in Austin, Texas. She applies a narrower test, and it has nothing to do with the feature list.
Halladay draws the line at a specific moment:
“For us, full service is about what happens after the technology is sold.”
That sentence separates two business models that look the same on a comparison chart. One ends at the contract. The other starts there.
Why Buyers Keep Replacing Systems Instead of Fixing Problems
The market gives a useful signal about how well the first model works. Buyers keep leaving.
Sapient Insights Group runs the longest running independent study of the HR technology market. Its most recent report drew on responses from 9,886 HR professionals across 4,670 organizations and referenced more than 1,500 solutions. That scale makes its satisfaction data hard to dismiss.
The direction of that data is unflattering for the platform first model. HR Executive reported the finding directly. Payroll and HRMS providers are the two categories buyers are most likely to replace. Payroll user experience ratings fell. Vendor satisfaction ratings fell further.
Companies rarely replace software because the calculations are wrong. They replace it because nobody solved the problem the software created.
The Lifecycle Behind the Phrase
Halladay describes what her team covers, and the list runs well past setup:
“We do not simply implement a payroll platform, hand over a login, and expect the client to figure everything out. Our team can support the entire lifecycle, from implementation and configuration to data migration, payroll operations, HR and HCM consulting, process improvement, compliance guidance, change management, and ongoing post production support.”
Read that list closely. Only the first two items are project work. Everything after data migration is operational, and operational work never reaches a finish line.
That distinction matters for how a buyer should read a proposal. A statement of work that ends at go live describes an implementation. It does not describe a partnership.
The Situations Software Was Never Built to Handle
Payroll generates exceptions constantly. A termination lands mid cycle. A retroactive raise crosses a quarter boundary. An employee moves and creates a withholding obligation in a state where the company has never registered.
ADP notes that employers must follow the laws where their remote employees live, not only where the company operates. Failing to track those locations produces improper withholding and other liabilities. None of that is a configuration setting. All of it requires judgment.
The complexity compounds as an employer crosses borders. PayrollOrg maintains an entire body of guidance on cross border obligations. Very few midsize companies staff for that internally.
Halladay frames the gap in terms of who the client can call:
“More importantly, our clients have people they can turn to when something is not straightforward. Payroll and HR are full of situations that do not fit neatly into a software workflow. Having experienced professionals who understand both the technology and the human side of the business is what makes the relationship truly full service.”
The exceptions are not edge cases. For a company running biweekly payroll across several states, they are most of the week.
The Engagement Starts With a Conversation, Not a Demo
Most payroll sales processes open with a screen share. Halladay opens somewhere else.
“We start by listening. Before recommending technology or changing processes, we want to understand how the organization operates today, what is working, where the pain points are, what the internal team is spending time on, and where they want the business to go.”
That last clause is the one buyers tend to skip. A payroll design that fits 90 employees may not fit 190. Sequencing the decision against the growth plan avoids a second implementation two years later.
Only after that does the recommendation take shape.
“From there, we design the right combination of technology and services around those needs. That can include implementation and configuration, data migration, payroll setup and processing, HR support, workflow and process improvements, and change management.”
The word combination is doing real work in that sentence. The technology and the service are priced and scoped as one thing.
Go Live Is the Start Line
Here is where the model diverges most sharply from the industry default.
Halladay is direct about it:
“Then we stay involved. That is an important distinction. Go live is not the end of our relationship; it is really the beginning. We continue supporting the client, helping solve issues and refining processes as their organization evolves. The goal is for H2R-Solutions to feel less like another vendor and more like an extension of their team.”
The research supports the emphasis. Prosci benchmarking data found that 88 percent of initiatives with excellent change management met or exceeded objectives, compared with 13 percent of those with poor change management. That is roughly a sevenfold difference, and it tracks the people side of the project rather than the technical side.
Public failures follow the same pattern. Panorama Consulting analyzed the City of Seattle payroll breakdown. Weak governance after go live and shallow change management ranked among the core causes. The software processed the data. The support structure around it did not hold.
The Market Is Drifting Toward the Middle
Halladay is not building against the current. She is building with it.
Deloitte research found that 73 percent of organizations outsource at least some part of payroll. The same study reports high demand for keeping payroll expertise inside the company. Those two findings sit together uncomfortably in most vendor pitches. They describe a buyer who wants help without surrendering control.
The same research program has tracked that tension for years. Deloitte’s global payroll benchmarking work shows how widely payroll cost and error rates vary between similar organizations. The platform is not the variable that decides the outcome.
Growth is concentrated in exactly that band. Mordor Intelligence projects that small and midsize employers will adopt payroll outsourcing faster than large enterprises. The forecast runs near 9.6 percent compound annual growth through 2031.
The delivery model is shifting too. Technavio identifies hybrid arrangements as a significant growth segment. Those buyers keep core processes in house and delegate the complex functions. That is a fair description of what a full service payroll and HR partner sells.
What Halladay Is Building Toward in 2026
Asked where the firm goes next, Halladay describes a position rather than a product roadmap:
“We are building toward becoming the partner companies think of when they have outgrown the traditional payroll model and want something more strategic.”
The capability plan follows from that positioning.
“That means continuing to strengthen our managed payroll and HR capabilities, expanding the ways we support clients throughout their HCM journey, and making it easier for organizations to get sophisticated technology and expertise without sacrificing personal service.”
The phrase HCM journey is worth noting. It assumes the client will change systems more than once. A partner positioned across the journey survives those transitions. A partner tied to one platform does not.
Growth Without Becoming the Thing She Left
Scale is the standard threat to a service model. Every firm built on expertise faces the same question once demand arrives.
Halladay answers it plainly:
“Growth is certainly part of that, but we want to grow without losing what makes H2R-Solutions different. The goal is not to become another enormous payroll company. It is to build an organization known for exceptional service, deep expertise, flexibility, and long term client relationships, where our clients know there are real people behind the technology who are invested in their success.”
That is a constraint on growth, stated out loud, by the person who controls the growth. It is also a testable claim. Clients will know within two payroll cycles whether the people answering are the people who understand their account.
The Question a Buyer Can Actually Use
Comparison charts will not resolve this category. Every provider checks the same boxes.
A better question is procedural. Ask what the provider does in week six after go live, and ask who specifically does it. Vendors that sold an implementation will describe a support portal. Partners will describe a person.
Halladay built H2R-Solutions to give the second answer. Readers can review the first part of this feature on why H2R-Solutions calls itself a payroll service company rather than a payroll technology company for the category argument behind it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does full service payroll actually include?
At H2R-Solutions it covers implementation and configuration, data migration, payroll operations, HR and HCM consulting, process improvement, compliance guidance, change management, and ongoing support after go live. The operational items continue for the life of the relationship.
How is a full service payroll and HR partner different from a payroll platform?
A platform sells software and support for that software. A full service partner takes responsibility for the payroll work itself, across whichever platform the client uses.
What happens after a payroll system goes live?
Exceptions surface. Terminations, retroactive pay, benefit deduction errors, and new state registrations all appear in the first several cycles. H2R-Solutions stays engaged through that period rather than closing the project at launch.
Why do so many payroll implementations need a second attempt?
Research on change management points to the people side rather than software defects. Prosci data shows 88 percent of initiatives with excellent change management meet objectives, against 13 percent with poor change management.
How many companies outsource payroll?
Deloitte research found that 73 percent of organizations outsource at least one payroll activity, while most still want to keep payroll expertise internally.
Is a full service payroll partner a good fit for a growing company?
It fits companies that have outgrown basic payroll software but do not want a co employment arrangement. Midsize employers are the fastest growing segment of the payroll outsourcing market.
What is H2R-Solutions building in 2026?
Halladay is strengthening managed payroll and HR capabilities and expanding support across the client HCM journey, with a stated intention to grow without moving to a high volume service model.
About This Feature
This founder spotlight was produced by Spotlight on Startups. The platform publishes journalist authored features on founders and growing companies. Readers can learn more about the platform, review the frequently asked questions, or read about the journalist behind the coverage.
Founders interested in coverage can review how the feature process works or visit the get featured page. It also helps to check what a feature costs and browse the glossary of terms used across our coverage.
You can also download the press kit, browse current coverage on the homepage, or contact the editorial desk directly.